Michael Pollan Retracts Comment about Meat-Eating Prius Drivers
At last week’s 2009 Poptech conference, author Michael Pollan made this claim: “A vegan in a Hummer has a lighter carbon footprint than a beef eater in a Prius.”
Michael Pollan
Days later, Pollan, author of the bestseller Omnivore’s Dilemma, retracted the statement after researchers showed that Hummers are significantly more destructive to the environment than hamburgers.
In a blog posted by Reuters’ Adam Pacisk, this evidence came to light:
- Gidon Eshel and Pamela Martin of the University of Chicago found, in a 2006 study, that the difference between a heavy meat-eating diet and a vegan diet was about 2 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per person per year.
- The professors found the difference between a Prius and a Hummer-sized SUV is 4.76 tons per year.
Therefore, switching to a Prius from a Hummer saves more than twice as much greenhouse gas emissions as giving up meat. Of course, going vegan and hybrid at the same time would be like super-sizing your carbon offsets.
email this article to a friend
Related posts:
- A Wave of Anti-Prius Vandalism in Seattle?
- Hybrid Drivers Cope with Snow and Ice
- Study: Hybrid Drivers Get More Tickets
- Can US Automakers Catch Up to Prius?
- J.D. Power Study: Toyota Prius Is Most Dependable Compact Car
Filed Under: Electric Vehicles
Comments
No Comments
Leave a reply